Cruise: 316N19961102 (dataset:CARINA) Data product: CARINA Successor: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: 316N147_2; 316N19961102; 316N147_2; AR24
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment version is immutable and published in CARINA! Click here to switch to new version (CARINA)
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View | |
RC_July08.png | [autogenerated from RC_Toste/adjustments!] |
View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:7
cruise:2
nitrate:4
oxygen:5
ph:7
phosphate:6
salinity:3
silicate:8
tco2:4
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19941012!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of salinity plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06GA20000506!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - salinity
The inversion suggest a correction of 2.31 ppm. Do not adjust. Consistent with
CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 10:49:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_salinity in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
offset__tco2_stdr_plot_316N19961102_1101.png | IIM-CSIC inversions result plot |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19970515!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of tco2 plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0. Very accurate, matches
with 33MW19930704.1 and 33RO20030604 in deep eastern basin so OK.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - tco2
Mean offset with 11 cruises: 0.2
No adjustment needed, confirming CARINA.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-19 14:40:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - tco2
This cruise is in GLODAP, where it got a suggested adjustment of 0 (zero).
The average cross over value for this cruise is 1.36.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
This cruise is a core cruise, and the cross overs with other crore cruises in
the area confirms this.
Based on these avidence I suggest no adjustment.
Toste Tanhua
Kiel, 2008.06.16
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-16 11:44:08 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - alkalinity
Mean offset -8.8 (9 x-overs), but large spreading of offsets. Inversion suggests
6.0. Some bad x-overs with 06MT19941012, 316N19810721 and 316N198121 caused by
offsets of the latters.
I therefore suggest no adjustment, confirming CARINA.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-25 11:20:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - alkalinity
316N19961102
alkalinity
There are 18 xovers. The fitted offset is +0.3. The suggested adjustment is 0
Except 2, all inversion residuals fits inside +-5.
Good fit with 1 GLODAP and 3 core-cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 13:56:07 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
316N19961102 - ph
Make -999 as there seems not to be measured pH data for this cruise.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:22:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0.96. In addition to
earlier comments: cruise compares 4.5% low against 33RO2003 which. although
compromised on its soutern extent, has accurate data in the latitude band where
it cruises 316N1996 (compared against RO2013, which regrettably is not included
in GLODAPv2).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
Earlier decision of adjustment of 0.96 is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 19:24:29 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
Suggested correction is 0.9345 and MO is 1.024, seems high . Consistent
direction but larger than CARINA adjustment of 0.96. Prefer CARINA suggested
adjustment as it is based on more data.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:17:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - ph
316N19961102 1101 944
pHSWS25
There are 16 xovers. The fitted offset is +0.001 The suggested adjustment is 0
Except 2 xovers, all residuals are very low and fits inside +-0.005.
Very good fit with 5 core and 2 GLODAP cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-13 09:36:14 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - phosphate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.053.
The inversions suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with core-cruises support an adjustment of this magnitude
(0.96).
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 0.96, in agreement with the
inversions.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 16:57:48 UTC for data product: CARINA
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19970815!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 18HU19970509!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of nitrate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06GA20000506!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - nitrate
Suggested correction is 0.9837 and MO is 1. Do not adjust. Consistent with
CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-03 09:28:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - nitrate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.015.
The inversions suggest no adjustment.
The cross-overs with core-cruises support no adjustment.
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 16:52:13 UTC for data product: CARINA
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 74DI19980426!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19970815!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19941115!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of phosphate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06GA20000506!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0.96. In addition to
earlier comments: cruise compares 4.5% low against 33RO2003 which. although
compromised on its soutern extent, has accurate data in the latitude band where
it cruises 316N1996 (compared against RO2013, which regrettably is not included
in GLODAPv2).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
Earlier decision of adjustment of 0.96 is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 19:24:29 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
Suggested correction is 0.9345 and MO is 1.024, seems high . Consistent
direction but larger than CARINA adjustment of 0.96. Prefer CARINA suggested
adjustment as it is based on more data.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:17:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.053.
The inversions suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with core-cruises support an adjustment of this magnitude
(0.96).
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 0.96, in agreement with the
inversions.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 16:57:48 UTC for data product: CARINA
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 74DI19980426!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 64TR19910408!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 317519930704!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19990610!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19970815!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of silicate plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19941115!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.02. Cruise is slightly low
compared to 316N19970530, which itself is a good match with RO2003, which is
considered the accurate 'backbone' here. Inversion suggesion in +1.6%
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - silicate
The inversion suggest a correction of 1.0222 and mean offset is 0.986. Does not
look very convincingly biased. See also evaluation of silicate cruise 2800, do
not adjust. This is in agrement with CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-14 13:40:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - silicate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.016.
The inversions suggest no adjustment.
The cross-overs with core-cruises supports no adjustment.
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 17:03:43 UTC for data product: CARINA
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 35TH20040605!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 33RO20030604!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT19970515!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06MT20030723!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View | |
RC_Toste.png | [Copy of oxygen plot for crossover: 316N19961102 / 06GA20000506!]; [autogenerated from running_cluster_toste/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - oxygen
The inversion suggest a correction of 1.0027 based on 13 crossovers with a mean
offset of 1.004. Do not adjust. This is in agreement with CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 14:06:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - oxygen
The average cross over value for this cruise is 1.005.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
Thed cross over results with the core cruises suggest no adjustment.
Based on these avidence I suggest no adjustment.
Toste Tanhua
Kiel, 2008.06.16
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-16 16:46:37 UTC for data product: CARINA
View comment(s) (filtered by ctd_oxygen in subject)
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 28 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
316N19961102 - ph
Make -999 as there seems not to be measured pH data for this cruise.
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2015-11-27 12:22:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated CTD salinity and CTD oxygen update
Automated update! This overwrites adjustment values (and flags) of CTDoxy and
CTDsal with the values from BOTsal and BOToxy for every cruise, unless CTDsal
(or CTDoxy) is not present or bad.
Salinity action ID:3; no CTD salinity data. Setting CTD salinity offset to -999,
QC flag removed.
Oxygen action ID:3; no CTD oxygen data. Setting CTD oxygen offset to -999, QC
flag removed.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-02-19 09:22:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - oxygen
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - silicate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : make 1.02. Cruise is slightly low
compared to 316N19970530, which itself is a good match with RO2003, which is
considered the accurate 'backbone' here. Inversion suggesion in +1.6%
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - phosphate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0.96. In addition to
earlier comments: cruise compares 4.5% low against 33RO2003 which. although
compromised on its soutern extent, has accurate data in the latitude band where
it cruises 316N1996 (compared against RO2013, which regrettably is not included
in GLODAPv2).
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - nitrate
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 1.00
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - alkalinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - tCO2
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0. Very accurate, matches
with 33MW19930704.1 and 33RO20030604 in deep eastern basin so OK.
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Autogenerated comment - salinity
Auto-uploaded comment from GLODAPv2 assessment by Steven van Heuven (src:
GLODAPv2_ATL_for_Carsten.xls / 2015-01-08): : maintain 0
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2015-01-08 16:41:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/oxygen: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOToxy available (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/salinity: update slope+intercept
autogenerated: only BOTsal available (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-12-18 16:52:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/oxygen: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOToxy (no CTDoxy)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102/salinity: init slope+intercept
autogenerated: using BOTsal (no CTDsal)
Posted by svheuven@gmail.com on 2014-02-25 17:02:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - alkalinity
Mean offset -8.8 (9 x-overs), but large spreading of offsets. Inversion suggests
6.0. Some bad x-overs with 06MT19941012, 316N19810721 and 316N198121 caused by
offsets of the latters.
I therefore suggest no adjustment, confirming CARINA.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-25 11:20:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
Earlier decision of adjustment of 0.96 is confirmed by new inversion for
phosphate in the Atlantic with 10 core cruises assigned.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-23 19:24:29 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - tco2
Mean offset with 11 cruises: 0.2
No adjustment needed, confirming CARINA.
Posted by mario.hoppema@awi.de on 2012-11-19 14:40:03 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - oxygen
The inversion suggest a correction of 1.0027 based on 13 crossovers with a mean
offset of 1.004. Do not adjust. This is in agreement with CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-17 14:06:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - silicate
The inversion suggest a correction of 1.0222 and mean offset is 0.986. Does not
look very convincingly biased. See also evaluation of silicate cruise 2800, do
not adjust. This is in agrement with CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-14 13:40:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - phosphate
Suggested correction is 0.9345 and MO is 1.024, seems high . Consistent
direction but larger than CARINA adjustment of 0.96. Prefer CARINA suggested
adjustment as it is based on more data.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-11 13:17:54 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - nitrate
Suggested correction is 0.9837 and MO is 1. Do not adjust. Consistent with
CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-09-03 09:28:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - salinity
The inversion suggest a correction of 2.31 ppm. Do not adjust. Consistent with
CARINA.
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2012-08-31 10:49:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2, v2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
316N19961102 - oxygen
The average cross over value for this cruise is 1.005.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
Thed cross over results with the core cruises suggest no adjustment.
Based on these avidence I suggest no adjustment.
Toste Tanhua
Kiel, 2008.06.16
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-16 16:46:37 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - tco2
This cruise is in GLODAP, where it got a suggested adjustment of 0 (zero).
The average cross over value for this cruise is 1.36.
The inversion suggest no adjustment.
This cruise is a core cruise, and the cross overs with other crore cruises in
the area confirms this.
Based on these avidence I suggest no adjustment.
Toste Tanhua
Kiel, 2008.06.16
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-16 11:44:08 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - ph
316N19961102 1101 944
pHSWS25
There are 16 xovers. The fitted offset is +0.001 The suggested adjustment is 0
Except 2 xovers, all residuals are very low and fits inside +-0.005.
Very good fit with 5 core and 2 GLODAP cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/12
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises.
d preffix in the upper X axis labels stand for pH determined with Alk and TCO2
using the CO2SYS routines and the Mehr'73 ctes fitted by Dick&Mill'87.
expocode ids in upper X axis stand for NA ids or SO_ids+10000 for avoiding
coincidences
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-13 09:36:14 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - alkalinity
316N19961102
alkalinity
There are 18 xovers. The fitted offset is +0.3. The suggested adjustment is 0
Except 2, all inversion residuals fits inside +-5.
Good fit with 1 GLODAP and 3 core-cruises.
Vigo 2008/06/09
Fiz Perez
Anton Velo
--
All xovers and output of inversions are refered on figure: "Report plot for
adjustments"
Real diff (Green dots) are the differences taken directly from xover routines.
The complete segment of error bar represents the xover standard deviation.
Yellow line stand for the offset calculated for this cruise.
Black stars stand for the offset calculated for the others cruises in the
xovers.
Blue squares stand for the Fitted differences that would be obtained from the
calculated offsets (Yellow line - black stars)
Red dots stand for the Residuals between the 'Real diff'(Green dots) and 'Fitted
diff' (Blue squares)
c suffix in the upper X axis labels stand for Core Cruises
Posted by avelo@iim.csic.es on 2008-06-10 13:56:07 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - silicate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.016.
The inversions suggest no adjustment.
The cross-overs with core-cruises supports no adjustment.
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 17:03:43 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - phosphate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.053.
The inversions suggest an adjustment of 0.96.
The cross-overs with core-cruises support an adjustment of this magnitude
(0.96).
Based on these evidence I suggest an adjustment of 0.96, in agreement with the
inversions.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 16:57:48 UTC for data product: CARINA
316N19961102 - nitrate
This is a cruise that is included in GLODAP, where zero adjustment was
suggested, although
this cruise was not considered by Gouretski and Jancke (2001).
The average of all cross overs is 1.015.
The inversions suggest no adjustment.
The cross-overs with core-cruises support no adjustment.
Based on these evidence I suggest no adjustment.
Kiel, 2008.06.04
Toste Tanhua
Posted by ttanhua@geomar.de on 2008-06-04 16:52:13 UTC for data product: CARINA
Hide comments