CARINA

Comments

This is a paginated list of all comments - click on the datatype to go directly to the commented object

Subject and comment	Comment for
	data type:	parameter:
06MT19960613 - silicate The average of all crossovers is 0.89 and the inversion suggests a correction of 1.17. Crossovers with the core cruises suggest that the phosphate data are too low. The crossover analysis of the adjusted data (1.13) suggests that this adjustment was too large; the new inversion suggest a correction of 0.96, and the average of all crossovers is 1.02. Based on this evidence, an adjustment of 1.11 was applied to the phosphate data. Posted 2009-06-03 16:36:55 by Toste Tanhua	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	silicate
74DI19970807 - phosphate The crossover analysis and the inversion results still suggest that this cruise needs an downward adjustment. The judgement is difficult due to relatively large scatter in the data, but is facilitated by the sheer number of crossovers. The average of the crossovers is 1.04, and the inversion suggest a correction of 0.97. The data is adjusted with 0.97 Toste Tanhua, Kiel, 2009.06.05 Posted 2009-06-03 15:34:16 by Toste Tanhua	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	phosphate
06MT20040311 - phosphate The crossover analysis of the adjusted data suggest that this cruise was adjusted too much. The average of the crossovers is 0.96 and the inversion suggest an adjustment of 1.04. Based on this the adjustment was changed to 0.97 Toste Tanhua Kie,, 2009.06.05 Posted 2009-06-03 14:46:24 by Toste Tanhua	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	phosphate
06MT20010717 - phosphate The crossover analyis and inversion of the adjusted data suggest that the adjustment of 1.20 was not enough. The inversion suggest additional adjustment of 1.05, and the average of the crossovers is 0.95. Based on this the adjustment was changed to 1.25. Toste Tanhua, Kiel, 2009.06.05 Posted 2009-06-03 14:23:10 by Toste Tanhua	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	phosphate
06MT19990711 - phosphate The crossover analysis and inversion of the adjusted data very constantly suggest thatthis cruise needs an upward adjustment. The mean of all crossovers is 0.96 and the inversion suggest an upward adjustment of 1.04, which is consistent with the mean. An adjustment of 1.04 is therefore applied. Toste Tanhua, Kiel 2009.06.04 Posted 2009-06-03 14:01:12 by Toste Tanhua	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	phosphate
58JH19980801-pH After comparing Greenland Sea deep water averages as well as calculated pH from Alkalinity and TCO2, the pH of this cruise was found to need an upward adjustment of 0.02. /Sara Jutterström Posted 2009-06-03 12:17:03 by Sara Jutterström	Adjustment Region(s): AMS
58JH19970414-pH After comparing Greenland Sea deep water averages as well as calculated pH from Alkalinity and TCO2, the pH of this cruise was found to need an upward adjustment of 0.025. /Sara Jutterström Posted 2009-06-03 12:14:28 by Sara Jutterström	Adjustment Region(s): AMS
58AA19950217-pH pH-data appeared too low and since both Akalinity and TCO2 on this cruise were questionable, the pH data are flagged 3 as well. /Sara Jutterström Posted 2009-06-03 11:59:39 by Sara Jutterström	Adjustment Region(s): AMS
06MT19990610 - ph Even though the adjustment after temperature correction should be 0.006, this was rejected on three grounds: 1) 0.006 is very close to the lower limit to do an adjustment at all. 2) We believe that the pH on this cruise was done very careful and with a very reliable method. 3) The crossover with 33RO20030604 suggest that that no adjustment should be applied. Toste Tanhua, Kiel Posted 2009-05-28 12:06:26 by Toste Tanhua	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	ph
06MT19990711 - ph Original pH scale changed to TS22 (Total Scale at 22º), This an increment on 1º on the previously supposed scale, and results in pH SWS25 increased in 0.014, so the correction now should be -0.0045, but the adjustment for the cruise is set to 0 as this value is below the 0.005 boundary Posted 2009-05-28 09:26:56 by Anton Velo	Adjustment Region(s): ATL	ph

Next page